2013年3月21日星期四

Tracing the theme of "The Presence of God" in the Pentateuch

Introduction:

Genesis chapter 1 recounts God’s creation of the heaven and the earth. The ‘heaven and earth’ means the entire cosmos is the “temple” since God’s presence fills the creation (Jer 23:24). And God assumes a position of kingly rest in it on the seventh day, demonstrating his sovereignty. This scenario manifests God’s transcendent presence in that he is not bound to any earthly dwelling place, but above and beyond all that he has made and distinct from it. Alexander reminds us that God also wants to dwell with humans in a unique earthly location, for he longs to have intimate relationship—his immanent presence with humans. With this concern in mind, the study herein attempts to trace the theme of the presence of God throughout the Pentateuch, with particular reference made to the nature and effect of God’s presence with humankind.
1. God’s presence in Eden
Old Testament scholars overwhelmingly agree that Genesis chapter 2 tells of the first sanctuary—Eden, a temple-garden. Garden of Edenגּן־בְעֵ֖דֶן  is an enclosure which means ‘delight’. Adam was placed by God in it, feeling secured and safe with all the provision, including a helper and companion, Eve. God is said to dwells in Eden too, confirmed in Genesis 3:8 that he walks in Eden and communes with man. Bartholomew and Goheen portrays a beautiful picture of Adam and Eve living in intimate relationship with God and in harmony with nature and animals. Humankind living in Eden enjoys absolute rest and acceptance as shalom expresses, the Old Testament word for peace, meaning the rich, integrated, relational wholeness God intends for his creation.
Gen 2:15 says Adam is “to cultivate it and to keep it”, means “serve עבד and guard שׁמר”, when used together often refer to priests who “serve” God in the temple and “guard” the temple from unclean things from entering it (Num 3:7–8; 8:25–26; 18:5–6; 1 Chr 23:32; Ezek 44:14). הִתְהַלֵּךְ  is used for God’s “walking back and forth” in Eden (Gen 3:8), also describes God’s presence in the tabernacle (Lev 26:12;Deut 23:14; 2 Sam 7:6–7). Sailhamer asserts that God is the king and Adam is the vice-regent or priest who bears the image of God. Adam is to trust and obey God’s word, which means submitting to God’s rule in fulfilling his priestly duty. Actually the rule is not oppressive but for man’s good. In keeping the rule, he will remain in Eden to receive the blessing and life forever, failing which he will be blocked from tree of life (Gen 3:2—24) and die (Gen 2: 17; 5:5). In sum, the presence of God also ensures the well-being of Adam and Eve physically and spiritually (Gen 2:19; 3:8).
However, we see in Genesis chapter 3, Adam and Eve succumbed to the serpent’s temptation and disobeyed God’s command. They had usurped the sovereignty of God by deciding themselves what is good and evil when they ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Roberts delineates this rebellious act as the quest for autonomy, a desire to separate ourselves from God which has been the nature of sin ever since. Obviously, Adam and Eve did not immediately die physically, but they were cut off from the protective presence of God who is the source of all life (3:8-10). Such estrangement between God and human first appears in Adam and Eve’s hiding from God when they heard the “sound” of God’s coming (Gen 3:8). However, God seeks the couple out to re-establish communion with them (Gen 3:9—24). Though God did punish them and have them driven out of Eden, he promises that evil will one day be crushed through the seed of the woman (Gen 3:15), where repentant people may be redeemed from the power of evil and restored as royal priests.
After Adam and Eve failed to guard Eden and their expulsion from the garden, the cherubim were place “on the east” to guard Eden (Gen 3:24). Sailhamer interestingly points out that elsewhere in Genesis the notion of “eastward” is also associated with separation from God’s presence (cf. Gen 11:2; 13:11). We take note of  the close parallel between Eden and Israelite temple imagery where God dwells with man, has fellowship with man, grant man rest (Gen 2:1—2;2:15), bless the people (Gen 1:28)  and received man’s service and worship (Gen 2:25). We may therefore conclude that Eden is the prototype of temple—God dwells with humankind, a place we dream for, the final hope of paradise we long to get to, yet remains as a distant dream.
2. God’s presence with Adam’s descendants, the patriarchs
On account of God’s blessing and commission to humankind: “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky, and over every living thing that creeps on the surface (Gen 1:28)”, Beale insightfully argues that Adam was to extend the geographical boundaries to Eden until Eden extended throughout and covered the whole earth. This means that God’s presence and glory were to “fill” the entire earth by means of his faithful royal priestly image bearers . Ever since Adam's failure, God has been on a mission to call a people back into fellowship with himself, so that the goal of creation would be realized that the whole creation will one day enter into his rest. To pass on the above Adamic commission outside of Eden, God preserves a line of faithful remnants who will receive his favourable presence: Seth, Enosh, Enoch, Noah, Abraham and other patriarchs.
There are a few expressions to illustrate God’s presence with the patriarchs. Seth and Enosh are first to “call on the name of the Lord” (Gen 4:26), signifying a true worship of God and a new hope of returning to God’s presence after the fall of Adam and Eve, followed by further drifting away of Cain and Lamech. Then Abraham, Isaac and Jacob also “call on the name of the Lord (Gen 12:8; 13:4; 21:33; 26:25)”, when they "pitch a tent" on a mountain, built altars, prayed, or sacrificed to Yahweh, and as a result, God “appears” to them (Gen 8:20; 12:7—8; 13:3—4; 13:18; 22:9; 26:25; 32:9; 35:1—7). Enoch and Noah are said to have “walked with God” (Gen 5:22, 24; 6:9) and Abraham and Isaac are said to have “walked before God” (Gen 17:1; 24:40; 48:15). These two expressions tell of the patriarchs having an ongoing relationship with God, enjoyed and conducted their lives in God’s presence (cf. 1 Peter 2:19). Besides, God also “appears” to Isaac and Jacob directly (Gen 26:2—5; Gen 28:13—15) to confirm promises that were previously made to Abraham. And God enables Joseph to discern future events by interpreting dreams, and guards all his ways in Egypt. Isaac “went out to meditate" (Gen 24:63) and prayer (Gen 25:21), and Jacob “worshiped” (Gen 47:31). The devotion of the patriarchs to God has become a binding factor to the presence of God since God appears to them or answers their prayer. And finally, God’s presence is also communicated simply by the expression, “God is with” Abraham (Gen 21:22); Isaac (Gen 26:3, 24, 28); Jacob (Gen 28:15, 31:3, 5; 35:3; 46;4), and Joseph (Gen 39:2,3,21,23; 48:21) .
It is noteworthy that whenever God’s presence is with the patriarchs, they receive promises from God and trusts that God will keep his word. This becomes explicit when Yahweh’s appearing to Noah had prompted Noah to build the ark (Gen 6:14, 22); and to Abraham with promise of land, numerous descendants, blessing and blessing of the nations (Gen 12:1—33; cf. 12:7; 13:4—17; 15:1—16; 17:1—21; 18:10—15; 22:16—18), then ‘‘Abraham believed Yahweh and he reckoned it to him for righteousness.’’(Gen 15:6). God later reaffirms the Abrahamic promise with Isaac (Gen 26:2—4) and Jacob (Gen 28:13—15). Similarly with Yahweh’s appearance and promise, Isaac remains in the land (Gen 26:2, 6), Jacob goes down to Egypt (Gen 46:2-5), and Joseph to be merciful and forgive his brothers (Gen 45:5-8). Hamilton Jr. rightfully maintains that God’s presence with the patriarchs has resulted in their obedience to Yahweh’s words (cf. Gen 6:5; 26:5), and that they beheld Yahweh, heard his voice, and by faith passed from death into life (cf. John 5:24; 6:40; Heb 11).
We have demonstrated above that God’s presence continues to be with the faithful remnants though on an individual basis, with the effect of conditioning their faithfulness. Their devotion to God and the informal sanctuaries foreshadow the future Israel's tabernacle where God is said to dwell in the midst of his people, the nation of Israel, as partial fulfilment of God’s plan to call all nations back to his presence.
3. God’s presence with Israelites in Exodus—Deuteronomy
Exodus—Deuteronomy begins with children of Israel multiplied substantially but lived in bondage in Egypt. This section on God’s presence is thus organized around Yahweh’s miraculous deliverance of Israelites from slavery in Egypt, and then entering into a covenant relationship with them, fulfilling the promises to the patriarchs that Yahweh would be God of their descendants.
God’s presence is first seen by Yahweh’s (the name of the God of covenant) call to Moses out of the burning bush, commanding him to deliver Israelites out of Egypt but Moses rejected (Exod 3:4—11). Yahweh then persuaded Moses by giving assurance of his presence, revealing his name and drawing relation to the patriarchs, ‘‘but I will be with you… I am who I am… I am has sent me to you…The Lord (Yahweh), the God of your fathers ... (Exod 3:12—15). Yahweh’s assured presence above becomes more tangible by inflicting “plagues” or more frequently designated as “signs and wonders” on Israel’s oppressor (Exod 7—11). Later, after Pharaoh’s armies are destroyed at red sea (Exodus 14), Moses and Israelites sing a victory song depicting God’s presence as a mighty warrior who has won the battle for his people and will reign forever (Exod 15:1—18). When Yahweh says he no longer accompanies Israelites to go up to the land because of its obstinacy (Exod 33:3-5), Moses reacted, ‘‘If your presence will not go with me, do not bring us up from here.’’ (Exod 33:15). Yahweh later conceded and in relation to this, Kelly helps us to see that, “…his seeming reluctance to accompany his people serves to emphasize the divine presence was an act of mercy and grace which Israel did not deserve and which she dared not take for granted.”
Elsewhere God’s presence is communicated simply as ‘‘Yahweh their God is with them’’ (Num 23:21), underscoring God’s presence will protect his people against Moabite opposition (cf. similarly Deut 20:1, 4). Moses summarizes the wanderings in the wilderness with the words, ‘‘..These forty years, Yahweh your God has been with you; you have lacked nothing’’ (Deut 2:7).
In sum, God’s presence with his people is tangible through words, signs and wonders, and symbolised by a royal battle warrior who delivers the people out of bondage. Throughout Israelites’ coming out of Egypt and wondering in the wilderness, Yahweh’s presence brings about the enemies’ defeat, insuring his people of physical security and also physical sustenance.
We could hardly miss that God’s presence is also communicated through manifestations seen, heard and felt by all the people—theophany, which marks the arrival of God. Numerous references in Exodus through Deuteronomy are made as follows:
·        Fire and cloud, for guiding the journey; “And the Lord went before them by day in a pillar of cloud to lead them…and by night in a pillar of fire to give them light, that they might travel by day and by night…”(Exod 13:21—22; cf. 14:24; 24:17; 40:38; Num 9:15—23; 14:14; Deut 1:33; ). And for punishing the wicked; “And fire came out from before the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” (Lev 10:2; cf. Num 11:1—3). And for defeating the enemies; “…he will goes over before you as a consuming fire is the Lord your God. He will destroy them and subdue them before you…”(Deut 9:3)

·        Thunder, lightning, smoke, for causing the fear of the Lord; “…..there were thunders and lightning and a thick cloud on the mountain….so that all the people in the camp trembled…Now Mount Sinai was wrapped in smoke because the Lord had descended on it in fire…and the whole mountain trembled greatly.”(Exod 19:16—18; Lev 9:24)

·        Voice of God, for declaring the commandments; “Then the Lord spoke to you out of the midst of the fire. You heard the sound of words and saw no form; there was only a voice.” (Deut 4:12; cf. 4:15, 33,36; 5:4—5, 22—27; 18:16)

·        Glory, for signifying God’s presence; ‘‘…But the glory of Yahweh appeared….’’ (Num 14:10).

Elsewhere, God’s presence is communicated through Moses’ unique intimacy with God being described as ‘‘face to face’’ communion with God on the mountain and in the “tent of meeting” pitched at some distant outside the camp (Exod 33:7,11; Deut 34:10). Even the people are said to experience, ‘‘Yahweh spoke with you face to face at the mountain....’’ (Deut 5:4; cf. Exod 24:9—11). Moses alone sees the glory of God from inside the cloud atop Mt. Sinai (Exod 24:18), but he is not allowed to look directly on God, just able to see God’s back (33:20—23); then his face becomes radiant and remains so after meeting God (34:29—35). Kelly concludes with significant remark on the above elusiveness of God’s presence; “The glory, therefore, both conceals and reveals God. It reveals enough to confirm men's faith and conceals enough to stimulate their reverence and quicken their devotion.”
In sum, Moses and Israelites have come to witness and experience the presence of God in all its awesomeness, tangibility, intimacy, let alone elusiveness. And the God’s presence provides guidance on the way, passes on judgement, consumes enemies, and arouses the desire to fear and trust the Lord, although for many such effect is temporary.
Now we have come to the climatic expression of God’s presence—the tabernacle. God commanded Moses, ‘‘and let them make me a sanctuary, that I may dwell in their midst (Exod 25:8).’’ Moses is to gather from among the Israelites the material required to build a tabernacle, with detailed instructions for the construction (Exod 25—31). The tabernacle will become the “tent of meeting” (Exod 40:35), replaces scattered references to “house of God” (Gen 28:17; Exod 23:19), mountain (Exod 3:1; 15:17), or sanctuary (Exod 15:17), “tent of meeting” previously used by Moses (Exod 33:7—11); where God and humanity may commune together (Exod 29:43). The tabernacle also replaces various forms of theophany mentioned above to convey God’s presence. Kuntz describes the uniqueness of the tabernacle as a symbol of continuous, covenant-presence of Yahweh with Israel. The tabernacle is portable so that God could guide the people and be with them as they go towards the Promised Land (Exod 40:36—38). When the tabernacle is completed, the glory of Yahweh fills it, indicating God’s presence is with the people (Exod 40:34-38).
The tabernacle takes the form of a rectangular tent. The extensive used of gold and blue fabrics indicates that the tabernacle is a royal residence. Yahweh is enthroned above the mercy seat between the two cherubim over the ark, making the ark the primary tangible symbol of God’s presence (Exod 25:22).The visible glory pillars of cloud and fire now rise up from and rest upon the tabernacle (Num 9:15-23).God is present within the tabernacle and the formal worship life of Israel is to take place here, where Yahweh meets with the people, gives his people divine revelation (Exod 25:22). The priests and Levites are in charge of managing the sacrifices, offerings and worship of the people. Through sacrifices offered mediated by priests, the peoples’ sins atoned, only then they are able to come into God’s presence (Exod 29—30). This aspect of the substitutionary sacrifice for people’s sin and barrier against access to the ‘holy of holies’ reflect the holy nature of God and underscoring that people’s indirect access to God’s presence.
In sum, through the tabernacle, God’s occasional appearances to Israel have now yielded to this permanent presence in their midst. The people will have a more intimate knowledge of their God. God’s presence through the tabernacle suggests much more than that; it is a partial restoration of God’s presence within the whole of his creation, just as he originally intended when he first created the world.
It is noteworthy that the tabernacle is never meant to limit God’s presence from intruding the entire life of the people. Beside the construction of the tabernacle, God stipulates laws for uncleanness and its treatment (Lev 11—16) and prescriptions for practical holiness, the Holiness Code (17—26), both for the people to uphold a right relationship with him in the daily lives. If God is to remain among them, the people must be holy. To be holy is to live according to God’s stipulated laws which reflects the moral perfection of God; it is to live a life marked by love, purity and righteousness (Num 35:34). Through the observance of laws, God’s presence becomes all encompassing over every Israelite since all of Israel lives take place ‘‘before Yahweh’’ and Yahweh hears and sees what happens in Israel. Hamilton Jr. reminds us of an important aspect of this God’s presence taking place as dwelling in the midst of people, unlike that through the indwelling of the Spirit in each individual member of the New Testament era; for God declares, ‘‘I will put my dwelling place in your midst and my soul will not abhor you’’ (Lev 26:11; cf. 26:12).   
In sum, God’s presence with the Israelites also reveals his attributes: his sovereign majesty, his holiness, his awesome glory, his power to perform wonders, his righteousness, and his compassion. And God’s people are to live a life reflecting the holiness of God if they are to remain in God’s presence and be blessed. By this, God’s presence has become a pervasive ruling force over the entire lives of the people, foreshadows a bigger picture of God’s presence fills the whole earth, a temple-city as originally intended by God in his creation purpose.
Exodus—Deuteronomy ends with God is the divine king with laws given for the people to obey; God’s people are under his rule again, they are able once more to enjoy his presence. Israelites eventually enter into a unique relationship with God, with the potential to become a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation’ (Exod 19:6). Such optimism opens up to the possibility of a blessed future where Israelites will live in harmony with the Lord on the land as God has promised the patriarchs. The presence of God with the nation, Israel in turn anticipates a return to the kind of harmonious divine-human relationship in Eden, but at a larger scale where God dwells with people from all nations of the earth (cf. Rev 21—22) .
Conclusion:
God’s dwelling with Adam and Eve in Eden is to have fellowship with them and bless them with resting in a harmonious living. Adam is a priest in the temple-garden, supposed to serve God by obeying the God’s word and extend the temple-garden boundary beyond Eden. When Adam and Eve disobeyed God, sin has come in and they were driven out of Eden. Ever since then God embarks on a plan to revive his fellowship with humankind through his presence with the patriarchs before and after the Flood; followed by his presence with Israelites. God’s presence is communicated through various ways to insure the people of their physical sustenance and faithfulness to God.
The climatic form of God’s presence in the Pentateuch takes place as covenant presence where God lives and rules permanently in the midst of his people through the tabernacle and observance of laws by the people. The presence of God reveals his attributes and necessitates the people to conduct their lives accordingly. Such progressive view of God’s presence portrayed in the Pentateuch is a partial fulfillment of Abrahamic promises culminating at the eschatological presence of God with all the nations—the new heaven and the new earth of Rev 21—22 which reflects the original intention of God when he first created the earth. 

BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Alexander, T.D. From Paradise to the Promised Land:  An Introduction to the Themes of the Pentateuch. Grand Rapid: Baker, 1998. 

Bartholomew, Craig G. and Goheen, Michael W. The Drama of Scripture: Find Our Place in the Biblical Story. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004. 

Beale, G.K. The Temple and The Church’s Mission: A Biblical Theology of the Dwelling Place of Go. NSBT 17. Leicester: Apollos, 2004. 

Brueggemann, Walter. Genesis. Interpretation. Atlanta: John Knox, 1982. 

Clines, David J.A. The Theme of the Pentateuch. 2nd ed.  JSOTSup 10. Sheffield: Sheffield, 1997. 

Fretheim, Terence E. God and World in the Old Testament: A Relational Theology of Creation. Nashville: Abingdon, 2005. 

Goldsworthy, Graeme. Gospel and Kingdom. London: Paternoster, 1981.  

Helfmeyer, F.J. “Walking with God.” In TDOT, edited by G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren. vol. 3, 388—403. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975. 

Kelley, Page H. “Israel’s Tabernacling.” Review & Expositor 67 no 4 Fall (1970): 485-494. 

Kuntz, J. Kenneth. The Self Revelation of God. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1967. 

McKelvey, R.J. “Temple.” In the New Dictionary of Biblical Theology, edited by T.Desmond Alexander, Brian S. Rosner, D.A. Carson and Graeme Goldsworthy, 806—811. Downers Grove: IVP, 2000. 

Roberts, Vaughan. God’s Big Picture: Tracing the Storyline of the Bible. Downers Grove: IVP, 2002.

Sailhamer, John H. The Pentateuch as Narrative: A Biblical-Theological Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1992.

­­_______________.  “Genesis.” In The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Volume 2, edited by Frank E. Gaebelein. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1990. 

Waltke, Bruce K. Genesis: A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001. 

Walton, John. Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the
                   Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2006. 

Wenham, Gordon J. Genesis 1—15, WBC. Waco: Paternoster, 1987. 

________________. Exploring the Old Testament: The Pentateuch. London: SPCK, 2003. 

________________. “Sanctuary Symbolism in the Garden of Eden Story.” Proceedings of the World Congress of Jewish studies 9 (1986): 19—25. 

2013年3月19日星期二

绿色风暴

列王纪上二十一1-24

亚哈夺取拿伯的葡萄园

这是一篇针对社会公义受糟蹋的故事。它对今天的基督徒灵性又有什么话可说呢?拿伯是一位正直,敬畏先祖,遵守上帝律例的葡萄园园主。他的葡萄园和亚哈的王宫毗邻, 而亚哈想要把那葡萄园收购过来,把它改成自己的菜园,但是拿伯坚持不把葡萄园转让给亚哈王。后果是,他必须独立对抗几方面的压迫:亚哈的贪婪、耶洗别的恶毒、以及父老们的猜忌和诬告。最终拿伯因此被迫害至死。

为何只看到自己没有的?

王宫与葡萄园毗邻。拿伯每天打开门,看见王宫的辉煌与奢华,心中不为所动。他只是一心守着先人留下的葡萄园。然而,亚哈每天一出门,看见拿伯的葡萄园就想霸占它,想把它改成菜园。为什么亚哈拥有无数的财富,包括各地的葡萄园,他还要贪恋拿伯的呢? 这里牵涉到人性里原始的贪婪,足以使人看不见自己已经拥有的东西,而定睛在没有的东西。从小孩子的天性里,我们看到这点劣根。恰巧的是,亚哈王经常被圣经描绘成小孩子气的无赖,需要耶洗别从旁献计,帮他向敌人施毒手。
 
王宫和葡萄园只是一墙之隔;贪婪和知足,也是一念之差。你每天打开门一看时,你看到了什么?你是拿伯或是亚哈呢? 何不为你已经拥有的,向神感恩,不要为你还未拥有的烦恼。 其实你比起很多人都好多了!

魔鬼的反创造

亚哈的贪婪是原始性的,如一般小孩子呈现的贪心。他得不到心要的东西,就神经兮兮。耶洗别,来自西顿的公主,有如魔鬼的化身,永远乐意去满足人类的欲望。她趁机为亚哈施毒计,把拿伯害死。有一点值得留意是,亚哈王一心想得到那葡萄园,原来是要把它改成菜园。他甚至愿意和拿伯交换葡萄园,或者付钱给拿伯。葡萄园在圣经里的意象,都是正面的指到上帝美好的创造与同在的福气,比如以色列就是上帝栽种的葡萄园。然而,这里亚哈把它占有的目的却是要改成菜园——映射当年埃及的被掳状况。相对而言,拿伯却是很珍惜这份上帝所赐下的祖业。这里提示什么?

原来邪恶或魔鬼的力量是要摧毁上帝的创造——反创造。上帝从空虚混沌中, 创造出美好,各从其类的地上万物。魔鬼来,却是要杀、要偷、要抢和毁坏。耶洗别,及她的家乡西顿,在圣经叙事的意象是代表邪恶和魔性。

今天上帝也是给了我们很多葡萄园。我们必须好好的守着它们。教会是那葡萄园,你愿意把守着它,不让魔鬼破坏它,分裂它吗? 你的家庭和美满婚姻是那葡萄园,你愿意按着神对婚姻和组织家庭的美意,歇力把守着它吗? 你的事业也是神交付你的葡萄园。还有其他许许多多你生命中的葡萄园。上帝在寻找一位忠心的拿伯。是你吗?

守候你弟兄的葡萄园

拿伯一个人守候葡萄园最终还是被恶势力打倒。那么那些地方长老和拿伯的弟兄们去了那里? 他们没有为拿伯争取公义,一同对抗邪恶吗?没有!他们好象对拿伯得居高位反而妒嫉起来。他们选择和耶洗别配合,把拿伯干掉。如果长老们看到拿伯被欺压,然后他们众口同声的谴责耶洗别的奸计,伸张公义,拿伯必不遭害,他的葡萄园也不会失去。

今天你有没有和你的弟兄一同看守他的葡萄园?当基督里的某一个肢体被欺压,被迫害时,你会站出来说一句公道话?为他解难吗? 或者当他行差踏错时,你会提醒他一句,扶他一把吗? 或者反问:你愿意容让你的弟兄,一同和你守候你的葡萄园吗?

在这个人主义横行的社会里,我们都不欢迎别人插手我们的事,包括信仰的范围。然而,整本圣经所论及的上帝,乃是子民的上帝,不是个人的上帝。没有人可以在上帝家里搞个人主义!让我们一同守候我们共同的葡萄园吧!

2013年3月6日星期三

The theme of Temple across the Bible storyline

Introduction:

‘Temple’ is the dwelling place of God among his people. This presentation aims to illustrate the theme of ‘temple’ across the Bible story line.

1. Eden was a garden-temple

Genesis chapter 1 recounts God’s creation of the heavens and earth. The ‘heavens and earth’, means the entire cosmos is considered the temple since God’s presence fills the creation. And God assumed a position of kingly rest in it on the seventh day, demonstrating his sovereignty. This scenario manifests God’s transcendent presence in that he is not bound to any earthly dwelling place, but above and beyond all that he has made and distinct from it. However, God also wants to dwell with man in a unique earthly location—temple, for God longs for human beings to enjoy an intimate relationship with him in his presence.

Genesis chapter 2 tells of the first sanctuary—Eden, a temple-garden. Garden of Edenגּן־בְעֵ֖דֶן  , means an enclosure and Adam was placed by God in it, feeling secured and safe with all the provision, including a helper and companion, Eve. Both Adam and Eve lived in intimate relationship with God and in harmony with nature and animals. There they found absolute rest and acceptance in an absolute blissful state.

Gen 2:15 says Adam is “to cultivate it and to keep it”, means “serve עבד and guard שׁמר”, often refer to priests who “serve” God in the temple and “guard” the temple from unclean things from entering it (Num 3:7–8; 8:25–26; 18:5–6; 1 Chr 23:32; Ezek 44:14). הִתְהַלֵּךְ  is used for God’s “walking back and forth” in the Garden (Gen 3:8), also describes God’s presence in the tabernacle (Lev 26:12;Deut 23:14; 2 Sam 7:6–7). So in Eden, God is the king and Adam is the vice-regent or priest who bears the image of God. Adam is to trust and obey God’s word, which means submitting to God’s rule in fulfilling his priestly duty to serve and glorify God. In so doing, he will remain in Eden to receive the blessing and life forever, failing which he will be blocked from tree of life (Gen 3:2—24) and die (Gen 2: 17; 5:5). To live under God’s rule in the temple-garden means to enjoy his presence and his blessing.

However, Adam and Eve failed in their priestly task when they succumbed to the serpent’s temptation and disobeyed God’s command. They transgressed the boundary to act as if they were God, wanting to decide for them what is good and evil by eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. That has been the nature of sin ever since. Then Adam and Eve were expelled from Eden (Gen 3:23—24), losing the blessing of being in the intimate presence of God. Consequently, the whole humanity and creation entered into curse instead of blessing, and became contaminated and enslaved by sin.

Later, God placed two cherubim to “guard” Eden (Gen3:24) and this resembled Israel’s temple where two cherubim figures are stationed hovering over the “ark of the covenant” in the “Holy of Holies”. The “tree of life” in Eden was likely modelled after by the golden lamp stand located outside the “Holy of Holies” in the temple. The garden-temple is just like the tabernacle, decorated by gold (Gen 2:12; Exod 25:3) and precious gems stone (Gen 2:21; Exod 25:7). We know that as the entrance to Eden faces east (Gen 3:24), the entrance to Israel’s temple faces east and is located on mountain Zion (Exod 15:17); and the eschatological temple of Ezekiel also faces east (Ezek 40:6) and is located on a mountain (Ezek 40:2; 43:12). There are four rivers flowing out from Eden (Gen 2:10), likewise the end time temple described in Ezek 47:1–12 and Rev 21:1–2 is said to have rivers flowing out from within.

In sum, as shown above we find close parallel between Eden and Israelite temple imagery where God dwells with man, has fellowship with man, grant man rest (Gen 2:1—2;2:15), bless the people (Gen 1:28)  and received man’s service and worship (Gen 2:25). Eden is the prototype of temple, a place we dream for, the final hope of paradise we long to get to, yet remains as a distant dream.

Gen 1:28:“And God blessed them . . . Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky, and over every living thing that creeps on the surface.” This is the first pronouncement of God’s blessing to man and it also contains a commission to man. By this GK Beale insightfully argues that Adam was to extend the geographical boundaries to the Garden of Eden until Eden extended throughout and covered the whole earth. This means that God’s presence and glory were to “fill” the entire earth by means of his faithful royal priestly image bearers. Ever since Adam's failure, God has been at work to re-establish his kingdom and to call a people back into fellowship with himself. He wants us to enjoy the goal of creation end enter into his rest.

In this regards, we see that out of Eden, God preserved a line of faithful remnant such as Seth, Enosh, Noah, Abraham and  other patriarchs, and passed on to them the Adamic commission. They are said to engage in “call upon the name of the Lord”(Gen 4:26), “walk with God”(Gen 5:24) and building of small sanctuaries, results in God appearing to them (except in Gen. 12:8; 13:3-4); also "pitch a tent " on a mountain; build "altars" and worship God, where they also "call on the name of the Lord," probably also include sacrificial offerings and prayer, at the place where these activities often occur, for example "Bethel"—the "House of God”. The combination of the above elements is an allusion to the cultic practice of Israel tabernacle and temple. So we see that God’s presence has not ceased to be with the faithful remnant and their informal sanctuaries in Genesis, a scenario points to Israel's tabernacle or temple whereby God is said to dwell in the midst of his people.

2.  Israel’s Tabernacle and the Solomon Temple

God’s unique presence with his covenant people is formally called a “temple”. The preparations for the temple begin at the Exodus. The first sanctuary is the tabernacle building began at Mt Sinai, a portable construction (Exod 24, 38:21; Number 3:25). God instructs Moses how to construct the tabernacle, the tent in which his presence is to be focused among them as they travel towards the Promised Land. The tabernacle is the place where God dwells in the midst of this people (Exod 25:8) and gives his people divine revelation (Exod 25:22). Through sacrifices offered and mediated by priests, the peoples’ sins atoned (Exod 29—30). God is the king and laws are given for the people to obey. Now that God’s people are under his rule again and thus they are able once more to enjoy his presence collectively. God’s people, the Israel nation is the priestly kingdom (Exod 19:24), ultimately through Israel the world be blessed.

The tabernacle is featured in three sections—the Holy of Holies, the Holy Place, and the outer courtyard. The ark of the covenant and over it the mercy seat and the cherubim were situated in the Holy of Holies. The lamp stand, table, incense altar, bronze altar and laver were also housed in the tabernacle (Exodus 40:1—11). The tripartite feature reflects a miniature model of God’s huge cosmic temple that was to dominate the heavens and earth at the end of time. The Holy of Holies represented the invisible heavenly dimension, the Holy Place represented the visible heavens, and the outer courtyard represented the visible sea and earth, where humans lived.

After the Israelites settle in the Land and at the time of Solomon’s reign, the first temple is permanently built, bearing many similarities to the tabernacle. From this place God dwells among his people, reveals his will and pours out his blessing upon his people. It is natural that the overall purpose is linked to God giving "rest" to Israel's king from his enemies (1 King 8:14—26). Besides, Gentiles can be joined to the people of God only by coming to the temple, for it is here that God chooses to deal with those who seek him (1 Kings 8:41—43).

The temple reminds Israel of the same task that Adam should have carried out but failed, Israel was to execute: to “multiply and fill the earth and subdue it” (Gen 1:28) by expanding the local boundaries of the temple to include the entire earth. That is to spread God’s presence throughout the entire earth. However, Israel wrongly viewed the temple to be symbolic of their election as God’s only true people and that God’s presence was to be restricted only to them as an ethnic nation. However, we know very well that God is not bound to his earthly dwelling. God’s presence in the temple could not be taken for granted or as guaranteed (Jeremiah 7). As God had chosen to dwell there, he could leave it if his people disobeyed him (Ezek 10), or even allowed his temple to be destroyed. Throughout Israelite history from wandering in the wilderness and living in the Promised Land, they have most of the time exhibited disbelieve and disobedience to God. As a result, they were driven out of the land and brought into exile as Moses had forewarned (Deut 9:4—5).

The exiled prophet Ezekiel says that though God had exiled Judah and Benjamin to Babylon, "yet I [Yahweh] was a sanctuary for them a little while . . ."(Ezek 11:16) This suggests that the presence of the Lord, which gave essential meaning to the temple, continued with the faithful remnant in exile to form an invisible temple for them until they could return and build the second temple. The same embryonic temple-building pattern occurs when the remnant of Israel returns from Exile to build the temple. They include:

(1) "Built the altar of the God of Israel" on the foundation of the former temple at Mount Zion (Ezra 3:2-3).

(2) They began to offer burnt offerings (Ezra 3:2), and they worshipped through the playing of music and by praising and giving thanks (Ezra 3:10-11).

(3) They also refer to the structure as "a house to our God" (Ezra 4:3).

However, like the Solomon temple, Israel's second temple fell short of the ideal description of an eschatological temple as Exodus 15:17-18 and 2 Samuel 7:10-16 and subsequent prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel foresaw, for example the new-temple (more magnificent than the first) promised in Ezekiel 40—48. The post-exilic prophets, Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi addressed this issue by prophesising that a great future day of perfect restoration will come. So now the hope is rested upon some future time God will act to bring about the eschatological temple presence alongside with his kingdom and the salvation of his people.

3. Jesus Christ is a temple

Jesus and the church have finally done what Adam, Noah and Israel had failed to do in extending the temple presence of God throughout the world. Jesus, the obedient last Adam, as God incarnate is God’s presence on earth, continuing the true form of the old temple, which in OT era foreshadowed Christ’s presence (2 Sam 7:12–14; Zech 6:12–13).

Jesus’ repeated claim that forgiveness now comes through him and no longer through the sacrificial system of the temple means that he was taking over the function of the temple as evident by the ruined veil at his death. The symbolism is powerful. The door to God’s presence is now wide open for all who will go in: “…..we have confidence to enter the Most Holy Place by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way opened for us through the curtain.” (Hebrews 10:19—20)

Jesus also repeatedly refers to himself in the Synoptic gospels as the “cornerstone” of the temple (Mark 12:10; Matt 21:42; Luke 20:17). Luke-Acts through Stephen’s frontal attack on the temple and the aftermath of believers scattering to the Gentile world, depicts the loyalty to the temple of Jerusalem was replaced by the loyalty to Jesus. John 1:14 says Jesus is the Word became flesh and made his dwelling or “tabernacled” among us. And in John 2:19, Jesus says to the Jewish leaders, ‘Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.’ He actually pointed to his body (John 2:21). Jesus standing in the temple courts, declared, “If anyone is thirsty, let him come to me and drink. Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, streams of living water will flow from within him (John 7:37—38).” This declaration alludes to Ezekiel’s promise of the new temple, from which a river would flow, bringing life to all (Ezekiel 47). Jesus is the temple and the water is the Spirit he gives to all who trust in him.

4. Christ’s followers, the church is a temple

As the Lord Jesus, the true temple of God has ascended to heaven; God continues to live in this fallen world. His temple now is a holy people. When we believe in Jesus, we become a part of Jesus and the temple. Paul reminds us: “…..your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God (1 Cor 6:19).” God also lives within us as a Christian community, in 2 Cor 6:16: “….for we are the temple of the living God” (and so likewise Eph 2:21–22; 1 Pet 2:5; Rev 3:12; 11:1–2).

Ephesians uses the temple image for the universal church where Jews and Gentiles forming the new temple (Eph 18—20), both have unhindered access to the sanctuary of God’s presence. Christ is the cornerstone, the source of church’s life and growth and the building can grow into a holy temple (Eph 2:21). God condescends to dwell in his unfinished and imperfect church.

1 Peter 2:4—8 completed the circle of ideas represented by the temple image. Christ is the cornerstone, the source of the church’s life and growth. Believers are ‘living stones’, exhorted to coming to Christ, they altogether form a ‘spiritual house’, to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.

Jesus the new temple also says that the Hoy Spirit will take his presence into the entire world through the preaching of the gospel (Acts 1:8). And inasmuch as people are gathered to the Saviour, there is also the new temple. So as Christians, we know God’s presence with us by his Holy Spirit; the church is God’s temple on earth. Are we fulfilling the role of temple, whereby harmonious and intimate

5. The New Heavens and New Earth is a city- temple

In the epistle to the Hebrews, the writers says that Christ the high priest has entered into the heavenly shrine (Heb 9:11—12; 6:19-20; 8:2) which is ‘true’ and its earthly counter-part as ‘shadow’ or ‘copy’ (8:5; 9; 24). Such heavenly temple is the setting for the drama played out in Revelation chapters 4—20. It is also depicted as the consummated condition of the New Heavens and New Earth in Rev 21:22, according to John, “I saw no temple in it, because the Lord God, the Almighty, and the Lamb are its temple.” The New Heavens and New Earth is a temple-city where the barriers separating worshippers from God are removed completely that they enjoy uninterrupted communion with God similar to the divine presence with his people and the rest of creation in Eden (Gen Chap 2).

In sum, the New Heavens and New Earth in Rev 21:1–22:5 are a temple—which equals God’s presence—encompasses the whole earth. It is the work of Christ and continuation through the people of God which consummates in the New Heavens and New Earth that will come down from heaven and fill the whole creation. Until then the eschatological goal of the temple of the Garden of Eden dominating the entire creation will be finally fulfilled, taking us back to the beginning, to the way everything was designed to be in the first place: a new Eden.

God’s people, the church now has a mission to shine as the light of the world, through witnessing Christ redemptive works in this dark world. In 1 Pet 2:4–5, Peter addresses Christ a “living stone” in the temple and his people are “living stones” who as a “royal priesthood” (allusion to Exod 19:6) are to “proclaim the excellencies of him who has called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.”

To experience God’s temple-presence, we must believe in Christ that he died for our sin. Three days late he resurrected and he now reigns as the Lord God. God’s Spirit will dwells in us just as God dwelt in the sanctuary of Eden and Israel’s temple. We are to as priests offer ourselves as living sacrifice to serve God, believe and obey God’s word, and with a prayerful heart witnessing to the world to win lost souls and strengthening them for priestly service to God. As a result, the boundary of the temple presence of God is extended and until Christ returns, it will be extended worldwide.

Conclusion:

God’s first dwelling with his people is in Eden, where God chooses to have fellowship with man and bless him with resting in a harmonious living. Man is a priest in this temple-garden, is to serve God by obeying the God’s word and extend the temple-garden boundary beyond Eden. When Adam and Eve chose to disobey God, sin has come in and they were driven out of Eden. Ever since the Adamic commission passed down to Noah, Abraham and his descendants until the formal form of tabernacle and Israel temple were erected.

The eschatological temple presence of God is culminated in Jesus, the New Temple.  Christ is the chief stone in the new temple and believers are closely connected to Christ being call the ‘living stones’ in the temple. The use of the temple image also serves to depict Christ’s work in that he secures forgiveness for his people and mediates their prayers to God.

Through the church now, people have access to God’s presence and be bless. The church is to carry the mission to expand this temple presence of God to their fellow humankind. Until Christ returns, a New Heavens and New Earth will descend as graphically portrayed in the book of Revelation which depicts God and the Lamb themselves as the temple. By then, God is directly and fully accessible to his people through his Son the Lamb. Then the whole of creation will finally achieve rest in the presence of God as that once was found in Eden.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alexander, T.D. From Paradise to the Promised Land: An Introduction to the themes of  The Pentateuch. Grand Rapid: Baker, 1998.

Beale, Gregory K. TheTemple and The Church Mission. Downers Grove: IVP, 2004.
 
Dumbrell, William J. Covenant and Creation: A Theology of The Old Testament Covenants. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1993.

Goldsworthy, Graeme. According to Plan: The Unfolding Revelation of God in the Bible. Leicester: IVP, 1991.
 
McKelvey, R.J. “Temple.” In the New Dictionary of Biblical Theology, edited by .Desmond  Alexander, Brian S. Rosner, D.A. Carson and Graeme Goldsworthy, 806—811. Leicester: IVP, 2000.

Richard J. Bauckham, The Theology of The Book of Revelation. Cambridge: Cambridge, 1993.
 
Roberts, Vaughan. God’s Big Picture: Tracing the storyline of the Bible. Downers Grove: IVP, 2002.

Sailhamer, John H. “Genesis.” In The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Volume 2: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, edited by Frank E. Gaebelein; Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervane, 1990.
 
Waltke, Bruce K. Genesis. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001.
 
Walton, John.  Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2006.
 
Wenham, Gordon J. “Sanctuary Symbolism in the Garden of Eden Story.” Proceedings of the World Congress of Jewish studies 9 (1986): 19—25.